Monday, November 12, 2012

Should I freak out about the election?

Attention liberals: this post is not intended for you.  This post is intended for conservatives that are upset about politics in the United States.  This post may cause you to feel angry, and perhaps develop a desire to argue with me.  I do not want to argue with you, so please feel free to read my other posts, or peruse the internet for pictures of cats, or robots, or robot cats.  By continuing to read this post, you agree that you are conservative... not liberal, not moderate, not "fiscally" conservative, but conservative.

Ok, so for anyone who was unable to discern previously, I consider myself very conservative on the political spectrum.  There are a large number of members of the Mormon church who believe as I do, although the church is politically neutral and there are many good members of the church that lean far to the left.  Since liberals are not reading this post any longer, I have no qualms in declaring that they might be well-meaning, but are completely wrong. 

The past few weeks have been filled with disappointment for conservatives.  There are many of us who believe that President Obama is taking the country in a direction that will weaken the United States defensively and economically.  I watched the internet and television on election night and felt my heart sink when states began turning blue.  I asked myself what was wrong with Americans, and could not help but feel a special disappointment with the state of Ohio.  I had, probably against my better judgment, been following several political conservatives in the media, and told myself that the death threats, slurs, and vile hatred being spewed out against them personally and those that believed in conservatism would be worth it because we would at least be able to put the proverbial brakes on the out-of-control big government mentality that had prevailed during the Obama administration.

Of course, people that were brave enough to declare themselves conservative were lambasted with additional profane and vulgar language after the election in the lowest form of gloating.  (for example: http://twitchy.com/2012/11/07/obama-supporters-serve-up-venomous-revenge-to-actress-stacey-dash-die-come-off-porch-house-slave/ warning: language

Writing a few posts on a blog has obviously not made me a target of the crazed haters that occupy the fringes of the left, but the feeling of being gloated over is seen in numerous passive aggressive statements from even well-meaning leftists.  A link that I have seen posted several times is one in which the First Presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints congratulates President Obama on his re-election. (http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/article/statement-on-election-result)  As a member of the church, this does not surprise me.  The church is politically neutral, and particularly where the opposing candidate was a member, it is appropriate to show that they are not unhappy with the result, and that Romney's candidacy was not (as some may have believed) an attempt to gain political power for the church.  It is positive, concise, and clear.

The issue appears when liberals use this and other messages to congratulate the President on his re-election.  They are frequently accompanied with statements exhorting conservatives not to "freak out" or expressing a desire to "work together" and "move forward."

Statements such as these come off to conservatives like this:
You should be happy about the results of the election because I am happy about them.
Or
You shouldn't freak out about the election, because my candidate won.

Of course, as a conservative, I believe that leftists would post far fewer of these "work together" and "don't freak out" nuggets of advice had Romney won the election.

In truth, conservatives such as us do have a few reasons to freak out... and no gloating liberal or progressive wearing moderate clothing is going to convince us otherwise.  Below are legitimate reasons to feel discouraged:

1. Obama's statement about "flexibility" after the election - (http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/26/us-nuclear-summit-obama-medvedev-idUSBRE82P0JI20120326) - The idea that Obama was moving to the center only temporarily in order to win votes is not baseless.  There were a number of promises that Obama made before his first term that he did not keep.  Now that there is no re-election about which to worry, how far left can he go?
2. The Supreme Court - Should there be any retirements or vacancies in the Supreme Court, Obama will appoint another subscriber to the "living" constitutional theory that believes pushing progressive theories is the unwritten goal of our highest law.
3. Socialist policies - Any one who talks about "fair share" without insisting on a flat rate for all social classes is by definition discriminating against certain social classes.  That is by definition socialist.  Obama has not even made a secret of his plan to make the wealthiest individuals (who are in the best position to hire others or to purchase the most goods and services from those that do) the target of his tax policies.
4. Lack of Defense - The Benghazi incident is consistently dodged by the Obama administration as "being investigated."  Part of the problem though is how a consulate in a notoriously dangerous nation was not watched more carefully and defended more thoroughly.  To the observer, Obama has placed a higher priority on his golfing than the defense of the country, hoping that his friendly demeanor will decrease the hatred of America by our enemies.
5. The Republican Party re-evaluating social conservatism - The party that gave us moderate John McCain in 2008 and moderate Mitt Romney in 2012 has started to wonder if they are too conservative.  The party's defense of traditional marriage and stance for the sanctity of the life of the unborn have spawned leftist campaigns encouraging women to "vote with [their] lady parts." (http://twitchy.com/2012/10/02/for-shame-women-obama-literally-reduced-you-to-sum-of-your-ladyparts-vote-like-lady-parts-depend-on-it/)  For some reason, the GOP thinks if we switch to a libertarian philosophy of fiscal conservatism and social liberalism that we will win, in spite of the fact that moderates have done poorly.  I find this point to be more discouraging than many of the difficulties that are coming or may potentially come out of the Obama administration.  Defending marriage is a noble cause... and so is trying to prevent the exploitation of the unborn.  Forfeiting principles in favor of popularity is the wrong move.  I believe the GOP should return to its conservative base and hold fast to correct principles regardless of whether they are popular or politically correct.
6. The Media - It is absolutely infuriating to see the lack of coverage.  Reporters have, for the most part, bought the "we're investigating it" line from Benghazi without asking for details of the investigation.  When interviewing conservatives, the mainstream media possesses a talent for finding those that are least able to articulate their views, or those from the fringe that could easily be portrayed as racists or undesirable.  Although there are a multitude of liberals that could just as easily make the left look foolish, they are always overlooked by the mainstream media. (http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-supporters-celebrate-election-victory-no-more-israel-fk-that-sht-kill-those-mother-fkers/ warning: language)
7. Pot and Gay Marriage as ballot measures - Several states including Colorado had measures regarding gay marriage and the legalization of pot.  The populations of these states apparently felt the small percentage of the population that actually use pot or are gay were among the most important issues.  Is changing the law for these items really that helpful for any state?  Certainly I am among conservatives that feel that the fact these things are even considered debatable issues is a sign indicating the moral decay of society at large. 

Of course the complete list of points is actually much longer, and any of these points could be supplemented with additional details and sources confirming how conservatives actually do have lots of reasons to freak out.

Ultimately though, in spite of the reasons for freaking out, even obnoxious gloating liberals can be right when they advise conservatives to stay calm.  Of course, for different reasons than they think.

Consider how many people freak out because they think that the world will end soon.  There is a wide sense across several religions that seem to perceive that we are living in the latter days, or the end times.  Though many religions have a similar perception, Christianity emphasizes the importance of the latter days through prophets and scriptures.  Christianity also emphasizes the terrible tribulation that accompanies the approach of Christ's second coming.

Below is a list of reasons that people could use to freak out that the world is ending:
1. Wars and rumors of war - Matthew 24:6
2. Earthquakes in diverse places - Matthew 24:7
3. Famine and pestilence - Matthew 24:7
4. False prophets - Matthew 24:11
5. Apathy and hatred - Matthew 24:10,12
6. Widespread pride and selfishness - 2 Timothy 3:2
7. Those that do good are despised - 2 Timothy 3:3

Essentially, all of these perils are being seen presently.  The calamities that prophets both ancient and modern have foretold are unfolding before our eyes.  Certainly this list is not comprehensive either, and details and sources could supplement any of these points.

Fortunately, I am not aware of any gloating liberals telling people not to freak out over these things; in fact, leftists are notorious for freaking out over wars, famines, earthquakes, and apathy (though typically only apathy toward spotted owls or 'climate change').

In the case of the signs of our times, it is Jesus Christ himself that tells us not to be troubled:
"...see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass..." (Matthew 24:6)

Jesus Christ is the master of not freaking out.  Even before he was brutally tortured and killed, he gave comfort to his apostles:
"Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid." (John 14:27, emphasis added)

While the gloating leftist stirs hearts to anger, the conservative that remembers Christ can have comfort in calamity.  In fact, the essence of conservatism should exude confidence. 
- A conservative does not need to freak out that injustice exists; we can have confidence that if we work hard, a source higher than the government will ensure that malevolence is punished and benevolence is rewarded. 
- A conservative does not need to freak out that some people have more money than others; we can work hard to improve our own circumstances, and give Christian charity to those in need around us.
- A conservative does not need to freak out that a few SUVs on the road will end the world; we can have confidence that Jesus Christ will restore the earth to a paradisiacal glory that has not been known since the days of Eden.
- A conservative does not need to freak out over the election of a President of the United States; as much as we love our country and want it to succeed, ultimately, as conservatives, we are also citizens of a great kingdom with an immortal and omnipotent King that is not subject to elections or the vices inherently present in political office... 

So fellow conservatives, don't freak out.  Think of the reasons we have to be confident.  Ultimately, remember that in the United States of America, we have no man for whom we shout 'God save the King' because the ideal for conservatives, and for all Americans is that God is the King.

Monday, November 5, 2012

"Reading my scriptures, going to church, and praying are ways to help me ______ ?!?!? I'm going to these things every day for the rest of my life!" - No one ever

When Jesus taught, he did so in a manner that provoked deep thinking and spiritual investigation.  He did not necessarily teach in the tone or manner that people expected.  In some cases, he talked about simple things such as being poor in spirit and meek.  (Matthew 5:3,5)  In other cases, he boldly declared that he would reject many that came to him calling him Lord.  (Matthew 7:21-23)

People were amazed when Jesus taught.  He taught "as one having authority, and not as the scribes."  (Matthew 7:29)

For 2013, the Mormon church has determined to re-work its curriculum for youth classes based on the same concepts as the missionary discussion replacement "Preach My Gospel."  The new curriculum is titled "Come, Follow Me."  It features the use of principles called "Teaching in the Savior's Way."

One of the concepts promoted by this style of teaching is the use of audience-appropriate material based on loose principles and outlines rather than pre-structured lessons.  The use of this method provokes a combination of excitement and anxiety.  I am excited at the prospect of people putting more thought into lesson preparation than cracking the manual open during Sacrament Meeting.  I am nervous about the prospect of teachers flying by the seat of their pants or preparing something that is completely off-topic.

If nothing else, hopefully this method of teaching will produce better questions to ask class members.  The worst question that can be asked in any lesson is the question that can be answered by "read your scriptures, go to church, and pray."  These questions are typically asked by well-meaning teachers, but they are hardly thought provoking, and used far too frequently.  A lesson with the subject of the Holy Spirit almost inevitably features the question "What are some ways that we can have the spirit more in our lives?"  A lesson about faith features the question "What are some ways that we can show our faith?"  A lesson about Temple attendance asks "How can a person prepare to attend the Temple?"  A lesson about strengthening families will ask "How do you strengthen your family?"

I have never known of anyone that sat up and started paying attention when the answer "read your scriptures, go to church, and pray" was given and think to themselves "that's right!  I need to read my scriptures, go to church, and pray!  I'm going to do these tasks without fail from now on!"

I have found that questions that challenge me to define Christianity or understand scriptures are far more thought provoking than questions that can be answered by enumerable lists of well-known information.  For example, if strong faith has been compared in the scriptures to moving mountains, then does that mean faith is generally weak since considering the low number of faith-based mountain moves?  Thinking about how faith is a power (Matthew 17:20), and how it must also be based in truth (Alma 32:21) can lead to a greater understanding of how it works.  Jesus questioned his disciples to challenge them to consider their faith asking what they believed. (Matthew 16:13-16)

Questions that can quickly be answered by "the atonement" are typically less effective as well.  Of course the atonement of Christ is the center of Christian worship and doctrine, but this information is probably not news to anyone that has some knowledge of the faith.  In general, if the answer to a question is painfully obvious, it probably should not be asked.  If a teacher wishes to help people believe in the power of Christ's sacrifice, my experience is that testimony is superior to a simplistic question that can be answered.  More thought provoking questions involving how ordinances apply the power of his sacrifice or the role of penitence and forgiveness are far more effective.

Ultimately, my hope is that teachers of Christianity everywhere will learn to speak with power and authority as Christ himself did.  Inviting people to come to God is better accomplished when manuals are simply read aloud, or when questions to which everyone knows the answers are asked.  The message of salvation is not casual; it should not be taught casually.