Showing posts with label #truth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #truth. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 21, 2023

Satire: Exmo Spent 37 Years in Numerous Callings Without Learning Nephi Killed Laban

 <satire>

Exmo Spent 37 Years in Numerous Callings Without Learning Nephi Killed Laban

"How could they have hid this from me!" lamented Frank Lisk.  Frank considered himself a faithful Latter-day Saint for 37 years, holding callings including Sunday School Secretary, Second Counselor in the Elders Quorum Presidency, Activities Committee Member, and Assistant Executive Secretary.

"I came to church every Sunday since I was a kid!" explained Frank.  "The only possibility is that the church was hiding the truth from me!"

Frank also asserted that his previously secret addiction to furry pornography has nothing to do with his exodus from the faith of his fathers.

"It's the dishonesty and the hiding that really bothers me," continued Frank.  "That's why I scream apricots don't produce popcorn while maintaining the court-ordered minimum distance between me and the local elementary school...  It's because I care about children... and their pets..."

</satire>

Sunday, March 13, 2022

Ward Preacher Podcast Ep 168 - Saving Israel and Egypt

Our Come Follow Me curriculum for the coming week brings us to Genesis 42-50.  We discuss the surprising reunion of Joseph and his family, and a final blessing from Israel.  Study with me!


Anchor.fm:


Soundcloud:

https://soundcloud.com/user-961318159/ward-preacher-podcast-ep-168-saving-israel-and-egypt?utm_source=clipboard&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=social_sharing

Youtube:



Sunday, January 9, 2022

Sunday, October 17, 2021

Ward Preacher Podcast Ep 147 - Truths From the Dungeon

This week our Come Follow Me curriculum brings us to D&C 121-123.  We discuss how many are called and few are chosen, the benefits of trials, and reporting the truth.  Study with me!


Anchor.fm:


Soundcloud:

https://soundcloud.com/user-961318159/ward-preacher-podcast-ep-147-truths-from-the-dungeon?si=ef17cad228394394a9b90583b13c6bbb

Youtube:



Sunday, July 5, 2020

Ward Preacher Podcast Ep 80 - What Korihor Did Was Legal

This week, our Come Follow Me curriculum brings us to Alma 30-31.  We look at Korihor the antichrist, and examine the legal and spiritual approaches for getting rid of his influence.

Anchor.fm:


Soundcloud:


Youtube:


Sunday, January 26, 2020

Ward Preacher Podcast Ep 57 - Handling Hard Truths

This week in our Come Follow Me curriculum we study 1 Nephi 16-22.  We discuss handling uncomfortable truths, and how much we should worry about the Chaldeans.  Study with me!

Soundcloud:
https://soundcloud.com/user-961318159/ward-preacher-podcast-ep-57-handling-hard-truths


Youtube:

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Ward Preacher Podcast Ep 042 - Perspective, Phobia, and Beauty

This week, the Come Follow Me curriculum brings us to Philippians and Colossians.  We look at Paul's perspective while in bondage, how to work with fear, and what true beauty is.  Study with me!

Soundcloud:

https://soundcloud.com/user-961318159/ward-preacher-podcast-ep-042-prespective-phobia-and-beauty

Youtube:

Tuesday, October 1, 2019

A Unity of the Faith

Unity is a major theme in Paul's epistles to the Ephesians... from describing how Christ abolishes the enmity between Jews and Gentiles, to this passage in chapter 4:

"There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling; One Lord, one faith, one baptism, One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all. But unto every one of us is given grace according to the measure of the gift of Christ. Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men... And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ: That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;" (Ephesians 4:4-8,11-14)

The idea of a single Christian faith was the goal of Catholic church...  The very term comes from Greek καθολικός (katholikos), meaning "universal."

 Unfortunately, at the time when the church gathered its leaders from all around the Mediterranean in Nicaea in AD 325, the apostles were gone... the highest authorities that remained were local bishops of various congregations, lacking not only the office that Jesus designated to lead his church, but also the authority that extended to all places to which they traveled... general authority.

As time progressed, the leadership of these men led to schisms and protests over centuries rather than the "One Lord, one faith, one baptism" that the apostle Paul taught.

Today, there are thousands of churches that profess belief in Jesus Christ.  There are numerous modes of baptism.  Various Christian faiths still debate over the most fundamental requirements of salvation.  While some claim that the thousands of versions of faith, and of Christ himself, are all facets of a single church, if this were the case, it would be the greatest manifestation of the "house divided against itself" that was described by Jesus. 

Claiming that Christianity is united in a single church is like finding a shattered mirror at a store that has been partly pieced together with scotch tape and labeled "definitely not broken." Even those with the best of intentions have found themselves "tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine" clutching only shattered pieces of the whole that Christ established with his apostles and prophets.

Is there a solution to unify Christianity?  What would it take to achieve actual ecumenicism?

The apostle Paul explains how the Lord intended to accomplish this feat:

"...he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers... till we all come in the unity of the faith..."

Some people might misunderstand the passage to mean that he gave to some people apostles, and to other people prophets, and to others evangelists, and others pastors and teachers... and so long as you have one of these, you're good.  This is incorrect.

The word "some" is in the accusative case... meaning it is the direct object.  In other words, it could be translated "he gave some to be apostles, and some to be prophets, and some to be evangelists..."  He made available men with these offices, to accomplish that Paul described after.

As important as this understanding is... perhaps the most important understanding is the pronoun he... the one doing the giving... The he is the Lord himself... and as always... he is the solution.

THE LORD calls apostles, prophets, pastors, teachers, and evangelists.  His Kingdom is not one of confusion, it is one of order.  He spent great length prescribing the construction of Noah's ark, of the Tabernacle of Moses, of the Ark of the Covenant, and of Nephite and Jaredite vessels.  He detailed precise directions for the children of Israel in the wilderness, and for Joshua's men to march around Jericho, and for Brigham Young to lead the pioneers in the west.  He patiently repeated his messages to Jonah regarding Nineveh, to Jerusalem regarding Babylon, and to Joseph Smith regarding the retrieval of the plates.  He deliberately and carefully divided even his labors in forging the world on which we now stand.  To suggest that any old schmo could just say "yeah, I'm going to be a pastor now," is contrary to the way he has directed his work for thousands of years.

Fortunately, there are apostles and prophets, called by the Lord, that preside over his church today.  Heeding their counsel will, as Paul suggested, lead to the perfecting of the saints, the work of the ministry, the edifying of the body of Christ.  Following their teachings will aid all in coming to a unity of faith, a knowledge of the Son of God, and offer protection from those who would, by cunning craftiness, lie in wait to deceive.

What was inaccessible to the ancient bishops who assembled in Nicaea in AD 325, is now available to you freely.  Do not neglect the privilege of your access to the apostles, prophets, pastors, teachers, and evangelists that he has called to help you find the one true Lord, the one true faith, and the one true baptism that will lead you on His strait and narrow covenant path.

Sunday, April 28, 2019

Ward Preacher Podcast Ep 18 - The truth shall set you sheeple free!

This week in the Come Follow Me curriculum, we look at John 7-10.  These chapters help us understand the source of Christ's doctrine, how we can know it, why Jesus lets misinformation circulate, and the famous story of the woman taken in adultery.  We also emphasize how the truth can make us free, and why being a sheep should not be insulting.  Study with me!

Soundcloud:

https://soundcloud.com/user-961318159/ward-preacher-podcast-ep-18-the-truth-shall-set-you-sheeple-free

Youtube:

Tuesday, November 4, 2014

Authenticity and social media

I enjoy using social media.  I regularly check Facebook, and although I rarely tweet anything, I follow a number of individuals and personalities on Twitter.  There are a number of blogs I regularly read.  Of course, as wonderful as some sources of news and information can be on the internet, I know enough to avoid some of the dark corners where the ugliness of humanity is on display...

Perhaps the experience of seeing how cruel people can be in the comments below videos and news articles made something I read from Elder Quentin L Cook's Facebook shocking to me.  He said this:

Elder David A. Bednar recently cautioned members to be authentic in the use of social media. A prominent thought leader, Arthur C. Brooks, has emphasized this point. He observes that when using social media, we tend to broadcast the smiling details of our lives but not the hard times at school or work. We portray an incomplete life—sometimes in a self-aggrandizing or fake way. We share this life, and then we consume the “almost exclusively … fake lives of [our] social media ‘friends.’” Brooks asserts, “How could it not make you feel worse to spend part of your time pretending to be happier than you are, and the other part of your time seeing how much happier others seem to be than you?”
At first glance, it almost seemed like he was advocating using social media to whine.  Don't try to be positive... be yourself... right?  And if you are authentically a disagreeable individual who derives pleasure from provocation, then don't pretend to be nice, because that's not authentic.  If you are the type of individual who secretly indulges in graphic depictions of sex and/or violence, then don't pretend you are only online to read the Bible... right?  Be true to yourself.  Be authentic.  Right?

On the other hand... Quentin L Cook is a prominent religious leader.  He can't be advocating the kind of comments on YouTube that use the F-bomb in every part of speech except an article and a pronoun... can he?  The invitation to authenticity can't mean an invitation to express hatred and vitriol from the comfort of the computer desk... right?  He's not excusing people harassing one another because they authentically want to...  Of course not.

The point is "we tend to broadcast the smiling details of our lives but not the hard times at school or work."

So to apply this, imagine an individual is having a difficult day at work.  Because they are short-handed, this person is required to do more work than normal, but still has pressure to appear positive when dealing with impatient and unhappy customers.  Under this pressure, the person makes a small mistake, and the supervisor has to come and assist in correcting it.  The supervisor has a frustrated tone as they remind the person of the correct procedure, adding to the frustration of the day.  After the workday is over, they come home to their computer and go to Facebook.  Here they see advice telling them to "be authentic" in the use of social media, and not just "broadcast the smiling details" of life.  They decide to write a big status indicating that their boss is a jerk for overworking them without increasing their pay, and that they were a jerk for handling a minor mistake.  Unfortunately for this individual, they have forgotten that their boss followed them on Facebook.  The boss posts a scathing reply and indicating how much pressure they were under, and how costly their mistake was.  The individual is then invited to turn in their supplies and find another job.

While I don't personally know anyone who has dealt with it to that extreme, I do know people that have experienced negative consequences for using what seemed to be authenticity regarding their employment or schooling.

Not only online, but in many situations, religious standards ask disciples not to be true to themselves, but rather to discipline themselves.  Consider the words of Alma to his son Corianton:

Now my son, I would that ye should repent and forsake your sins, and go no more after the lusts of your eyes, but cross yourself in all these things; for except ye do this ye can in nowise inherit the kingdom of God. Oh, remember, and take it upon you, and cross yourself in these things. (Alma 39:9)
Consider also the words in the book of Matthew:

Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it.  (Matthew 16:24-25)

The goal behind every Christian faith should always be to make bad men good, and to make good men better... not to make men comfortable with how they currently are.

So how do the two ideas become reconciled?

The answer involves understanding the link between what Elder Cook described as "authenticity" and the word honesty.

The same dilemma is sometimes mocked in social media posts where a girlfriend approaches her boyfriend in some unflattering outfit and asks if it makes her look "fat."  If he answers honestly, even if he is as polite as he can be, the girlfriend takes offense.  If he tells her that it does not, he is being dishonest.  And anymore, if he dodges the question, the girlfriend takes it as a yes, and takes offense.  How does a person be "authentic" while still "denying himself"?  How can a person be honest and kind?

Let me suggest that the request to be authentic is not a suggestion to air dirty laundry.  It's not to "vent" or "lash out" or be "passive aggressive" toward people that seem irritating.  When prophets and scriptures counsel men to be honest, they do not mean to be cruel.  Latter Day Saints, as all Christians, ought to embrace that which is "virtuous, lovely, or of good report, or praiseworthy." (Art of Faith 1:13)  The invitation to be authentic does not mean to become cynical or pessimistic
either.

Being authentic means attempting to avoid hypocrisy.  Practicing what we preach is vital to religious worship.  In other words... continue to broadcast the smiling details of your life AND make sure you smile in life.  Make a smiley-face emoji, but also try to make your face smile.

Being authentic also applies to how you treat others.  If you have "friends" online... try and be actually friendly to them.  If you disagree with someone, be civil, and resist the urge to stir up contention.

Don't pretend to be happy... become happy.  Don't pretend to have faith... exercise faith.  Don't pretend to be better than you are... but in a deliberate, diligent, and authentic manner, and in social media as well as every other aspect of life... become like Christ.  Because Christ was the ultimate example of being the best.

Monday, December 23, 2013

The Condescension of God



The Christmas season is time of gift giving, a tradition that stems from the magi who traveled from the east and gave the Christ child gold, frankincense, and myrrh.  Contemporarily, children look under trees with anticipation of receiving games, toys, and sweets.  The true root of gift giving is a much older story however.  Before men were born; before the world was forged, there was another gift for which every child of God yearned, and our Heavenly Father wanted very much to give it to us. The gift is immortality and eternal life, but it is not a gift that is easily received.  In fact, almost no one was eligible to receive the greatest of all the gifts of God.  Our Heavenly Father called for the sacrifice of one that would be able to not only save himself, but to condescend below all things, that he might lift the sons of men above all things.  Jesus Christ stood and declared “Here am I… send me.”  As our Father accepted him as worthy and able, he became to us a God, the only hope of salvation, and the joy of mans’ desiring.

Even children have the benefit of Christmas traditions that teach at an early age the characters of the Nativity story.  We have known from our youth of Mary, Joseph, the shepherds, the wise men, and the Christ child… but what if we had not known?  What if we had to be taught these things without the benefit of Christmas symbols?  Nephi was a prophet that lived 600 years before the birth of Christ.  He did not have any holiday traditions when he was taught the Christmas story.  An angel of God showed him a vision and asked what he beheld.  He replied, “A virgin, most beautiful and fair above all other virgins.”  The angel asked a profound question… “Knowest thou the condescension of God?”  Nephi replied, “I know that he loveth his children; nevertheless, I do not know the meaning of all things.”  The angel then showed him the virgin bearing a child in her arms.  With a single concise phrase, Nephi learned the true meaning of Christmas: “Behold, the condescension of God!”

Most people eagerly anticipate Christmas day, perhaps because of proximity to friends and loved ones, perhaps because of the hope of a chocolate-filled stocking, or something special underneath the tree.  The first Christmas was also anticipated greatly, but for other reasons.  The people in the promised land that believed in Jesus had been given that day as a deadline to justify their faith, and if the prophesied signs of Christ’s birth did not appear, they would be killed.  How anxious they must have been to see that their faith was not in vain.  But even as the wicked prepared to spill the blood of the righteous, the prayers of Christians reached the heavens.  When the sun set that night, the light did not wane away into the darkness of night.  In the very act of condescending, the light of the world saved those that had faith in him.

Christmas does not always bring tidings of comfort and joy.  Every year, people brave crowds at local retailers, and amid the pushing, shoving, and dirty looks, they seek meaningful gifts for loved ones.  Husbands scratch their heads and ask themselves "If I buy these shoes for her, do I also have to buy those earrings?"  Wives seek the assistance of unmotivated seasonal sales associates to ask "Do I need a nunchuck controller with the Legend of Zelda?"  It is not difficult to become so preoccupied with the hustle and bustle that Christ becomes disassociated with the majority of our Christmas season.  Perhaps it was the same hustle and bustle that caused innkeepers of Bethlehem to experience difficulty in finding room for a young expectant mother and her husband.  Perhaps they thought they were doing the best they could when they sent Mary to a pen of animals, it was tax season after all.  Whatever the reasons, when Mary gave birth to her son, she had only swaddling clothes in a stable to warm him.  When she laid him down, the trough where animals chewed hay was his bed.  While men of wealth and prestige sat in the company of peers, the King of Kings moved from a throne in the high heavens in the presence of our Heavenly Father, to a stable in the company of livestock.  Somehow, when everyone else was busy, the most High God descended down to the most humble place on Earth.

Even to the adults that understand the principles of electricity, and know the effort of stringing them up, there is a feeling of happiness that Christmas lights bring.  To children who do not understand these things, it is even more so.  It is not so much because understanding ruins things, but perhaps because innocence is so frequently accompanied by humility, which magnifies appreciation.  Even in ancient times it was so.  SPQR are the letters that every soldier's banner bore in the land to which Christ came.  Senatus Populusque Romanus... The senate and the people of Rome.  The empire was arguably the most powerful and prestigious that was ever on the earth, and it was filled with wise, powerful, strong, and wealthy people; and none more so than its emperor, Caesar Augustus.  However, it was not Caesar, or any of his appointed, or any philosophers or warriors to whom God sent word of his condescension.  Luke tells us that there were in the same country shepherds, keeping watch over their flock by night.  And, lo, the angel of the Lord came upon them, and the glory of the Lord shone round about them.  And they were sore afraid.  And the angel said unto them, fear not, for behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy which shall be to all people.  For unto you is born this day in the city of David, a savior, which is Christ, the Lord.  And this shall be a sign unto you: ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger.

As commercial and cold as the retail experience of Christmas can be, the season also brings a renewed desire to help those in need.  Few experiences are as memorable as seeing the gratitude of someone receiving the very thing they require.  Perhaps there are those among us who have played the roles both of giver, and of recipient.  Called by some the true meaning of Christmas, it is in a truer sense the true meaning of Christianity.  Because he condescended below all men, he knows what it means to be hungry, to be hurt, to be fatigued.  He knows what it means to be lonely, and hated, and betrayed.  Is it any wonder he declared that "by this shall all men know that ye are my disciples: if ye have love one to another"?

There is a Christmas hymn in which a man sorrows that "Hate is strong, and mocks the song of peace on Earth, good will to men..."  He is answered by Christmas bells, that seem to say with faith and power "God is not dead, nor doth he sleep."  Two of the characters most forgotten in the old Christmas story are the two that knew that best.  Anna and Simeon saw no angel, they did not follow a new star in the east; instead they stayed at the temple.  They did not need the persuasion of fictional spirits of Christmas Past, Present, or Future; they followed the Spirit of God, and because of their faith, Christ came to them.  Two thousand years later, the same spirit that guided them pleads with us not to despair... for God is not dead, nor doth he sleep.  The Holy Spirit of God guides us, just as it did Anna and Simeon; and it brings the power of Jesus Christ across time to our hearts here and now: not just a story of a child in a manger, or a choir of angels in the fields near Bethlehem, but the power of his atoning sacrifice.  And it is the faith, penitence, and humility of men that give purpose to his sacrifice... for it is only with our consent that we can be redeemed.  My brothers and sisters... especially during this time when we celebrate the coming of Christ... let us be as Anna and Simeon and follow the guidance of his Holy Spirit.  Let our penitence give cause to his sacrifice.  Let us do all things that we might have the gift for which we sought in that grand council before the world was: the gift of eternal life!  Oh come all ye faithful... joyful and triumphant...  Oh come let us adore him!  Come and behold him: born the King of Angels!  Come and celebrate the condescension of God!

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

You have more than five senses: don't let Aristotle limit your perception!

Greek philosopher Aristotle is widely credited with being the first to define the five senses by which humanity perceives the world.  The concept that the acquisition of knowledge is limited to sight, sound, odor, flavor, and touch is taught even today.  This concept appears at first to be logical as each of these senses seem to correspond well to an obvious sensory organ: eyes provide vision, ears provides hearing, noses reveal odors, tongues detect flavors, and skin detects the many varieties of touch.

Unfortunately, this list is far from complete.  Consider the sense of balance that most people possess.  Tiny canals in the inner ear help us determine whether we are upright or upside down.  These same canals also help provide humans with the ability to detect acceleration.

Additionally, pain is not only limited to things that touch our skin.  Certainly anyone who has experienced a headache, stomachache, or other internal ache realizes that their body is capable of slowing them down dramatically when it detects some problem.

Consider the ability of humans to know when their bodies require more food or water through hunger or thirst.  Anyone who has indulged at a buffet may also recognize the sensation of being full, particularly when they may have over-indulged.  We also are able to detect when our bodies are reaching their use limits through the sense of fatigue.  Additionally, expecting mothers are perhaps most familiar with food cravings that can help them obtain vitamins, minerals, and chemicals that they need.

Though no specific organ is associated with it, humans have the ability to determine the passage of time.  Though it may seem longer when waiting for water to boil or during an uninteresting meeting, even closed away from the light of the sun, people can have a general sense of time passing.

Current scientific understanding will likely discover additional ways that human bodies are able to perceive information about their surroundings and circumstances.  One sense that may not be detected so easily is the ability of humans to detect spiritual truth.

The sense that something is spiritually true is dismissed by some because there are diverse views on what is spiritually true.  Also, falsehoods have in some cases been peddled as truth using appeals to this sense.  That having been said, its use is well documented.

Consider the following conversation between Christ and his Apostles:

"He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?  And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." (Matthew 16:15-18)

Certainly Peter had seen miracles and evidences that contributed to his belief that Jesus was the Son of God, but Christ did not point to the use of his sight and observation as the source of his acquired knowledge.  He clearly stated that "flesh and blood" had not been the cause of his revelation, but his Father in heaven.  He further declared that the ability to obtain truth from our Father in heaven, or sense spiritual truth was the rock upon which his church would be built.

Consider the following from the disciples of Christ on the road to Emmaus:

" ¶And, behold, two of them went that same day to a village called Emmaus, which was from Jerusalem about threescore furlongs. And they talked together of all these things which had happened. And it came to pass, that, while they communed together and reasoned, Jesus himself drew near, and went with them. But their eyes were holden that they should not know him. And he said unto them, What manner of communications are these that ye have one to another, as ye walk, and are sad? And the one of them, whose name was Cleopas, answering said unto him, Art thou only a stranger in Jerusalem, and hast not known the things which are come to pass there in these days? And he said unto them, What things? And they said unto him, Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, which was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people: And how the chief priests and our rulers delivered him to be condemned to death, and have crucified him. But we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this, to day is the third day since these things were done. Yea, and certain women also of our company made us astonished, which were early at the sepulchre; And when they found not his body, they came, saying, that they had also seen a vision of angels, which said that he was alive. And certain of them which were with us went to the sepulchre, and found it even so as the women had said: but him they saw not. Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken: Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory? And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself. And they drew nigh unto the village, whither they went: and he made as though he would have gone further. But they constrained him, saying, Abide with us: for it is toward evening, and the day is far spent. And he went in to tarry with them. And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, he took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and gave to them. And their eyes were opened, and they knew him; and he vanished out of their sight. And they said one to another, Did not our heart burn within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the scriptures?" (Luke 24:13-32)

The method by which these disciples recognized the identity of the man with whom they walked as the risen Lord was not sight, even though they saw him.  They had sensed spiritual truth as he spoke, and noted this with one another as they described how their "heart[s] burn[ed] within" them. 

The Apostle John declared at the beginning of his gospel how Christ was "the true light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world." (John 1:9)

Additionally, Christ himself taught "I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine." (John 10:14)  Of course, the only way that he could be "known" by others is if they had some mechanism for recognizing who he was, just as Peter did.

Just as any other sense, there are limitations on our ability to discern spiritual truth.  Optical illusions trick our sense of sight into seeing something that may not be.  Spiritual illusions can fool people into trusting incorrect sources, or withholding trust from accurate sources.  The children of Israel famously decided it was in their best interest to create a golden calf while Moses communed with God on Sinai. (Exodus 32)  True prophets such as Jeremiah, Isaiah, and John the Baptist were killed by people who should have had spiritual sense to recognize them for who they truly were.

It is also important to note that like other senses, spiritual perception can be dulled.  A person that first encounters the odor of rotting flesh will be repulsed immediately, but if they spend long enough around it, the odor becomes far easier to tolerate to the point that it may not be noticeable.  The same thing is true of moral questions.  King David went from seeing a woman bathing to arranging the death of her husband to cover his sins over a period of time.  Additionally, senses that are not properly used, or are abused, will not be as missed when they are gone.  People who as youth listened to loud music too often may not be able to distinguish sounds when they are older.  People who intentionally ignore their spiritual senses are most likely to conclude later that they never had any to begin with.

There are those who might say that because spiritual sensitivity can lead people to different conclusions, it cannot be trusted.  Of course, if that is true, then the same should be true of all other senses, which also tend to lead people to different conclusions.  What inspires one observer of modern art to call a piece "moving" and "skillful" while another observer calls it "a heap of crap" and "something my kid could do blindfolded"?  What is it that inspires one listener to enjoy the rhythm of a song, and another to complain of its "repetitive noise"?  What causes one person to relish the flavor of a sushi roll, and another to spit it out in disgust?  What causes the masochist to enjoy pain while others perceive it so negatively?

Ultimately, everyone embraces an incorrect view or perspective from time to time.  The point of life is not to shut off your perception... A person is wiser when using all their senses to perceive the world around them.  It is also wise to question the motivation of individuals that would have others disregard or avoid perceptions of any particular sense or group of senses.

If you are new to exercising spiritual senses, or if you have not used them in some time, do not let discouragement prevent you from persisting.  Prayer and scripture study have aided people in developing their spiritual senses for thousands of years.  Humility, diligence, faith, and penitence are as vital to recognizing spiritual truths as opening the eyelids or unstopping the ears are to improving vision and hearing.

In the end, whatever conflicts or discrepancies may arise with various perceptions will be overcome, and we will all understand the truth.  "For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known." (1 Corinthians 13:12)  Ultimately, we will all know that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, and that his gospel offers solutions to every problem humanity faces.  The sooner we use our perceptions to see him, the sooner his power will help to save us all.

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Is the Bible authoritative?





Is the Bible authoritative?

The answer to this question depends on the branch of Christianity.

The original church that Christ established existed before the Bible, which meant that the word of God was not a single closed book.  This is not to say they did not value scripture.  Matthew’s gospel points out that many Old Testament passages are fulfilled by Christ, and Paul discusses the value of the law in his numerous epistles. 

Scripture was not the ultimate authoritative source of guidance for Christ’s original church; the Apostles were.  They had authority to be witnesses of Christ and his gospel to all the world, and through guidance they received in the form of visions and revelations, they established new doctrines that directly contradicted established scriptural practices such as the dietary law of Moses, circumcision, Sabbath day observance, and so forth, while maintaining the spirit of the laws contained in the scriptures.

The leadership of the Apostles worked well until they were all caught and/or killed.  The remaining bishops in the church tried to maintain Christianity, but over time they began to disagree.  Eventually, the Roman emperor Constantine converted to Christianity and prohibited persecution of Christians in 313. Later Theodosius made Christianity the state religion of the Roman Empire on 27 February 380.  The Bishop of Rome became known as the Pope, and from that time, the Papacy has claimed an unbroken line of authority that goes back to the Apostle Peter to whom Christ said “And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” (Matthew 16:18)

The majority of Christians seemed satisfied with the authority of the Pope, but eventually, concerns were expressed when their actions seemed inconsistent with Biblical teachings.  Specifically, Martin Luther nailed 95 theses to the door of the Castle church in Wittenburg protesting the sale of indulgences, which basically amounted to certificates of forgiveness for sins.  Eventually, the dispute between Luther and Pope Leo X resulted in Luther being excommunicated from the Catholic Church.  Luther openly rejected the authority of the Pope, and instead demanded that his actions be proven wrong based on scripture.

For the Protestant movement to have authority after breaking away from the formerly accepted unbroken line of leadership in Catholicism, it was necessary that something besides the Pope be the authoritative guide for Christianity.  To this day, the Bible is that authoritative source for defining faith for Protestants.

So, on the one hand, Catholic authority derives from Papal claims, and the Bible does not need to be authoritative.  On the other, Protestants must use it as the authoritative source of Christianity.  There is a third group that differs from these two.  They can be called restorationists and they believe in a literal restoration of Apostolic authority.

The largest of these groups is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.  The story of their restoration begins with Joseph Smith.  Like Stephen in the New Testament, he saw God the Father and his son Jesus Christ.  Because the authority to lead the church had been lost with the Apostles, it needed to be restored at the hands of Apostles.  In 1829, Joseph Smith received this authority from Peter, James, and John.

The line of authority continues today with Apostles that stand as in the days of Jesus, guiding Christians with revealed truths.  Though restorationists teach that the Bible is the word of God, they follow the precedent in the Bible by proclaiming that God’s word is not a fixed or completed work, but that he guides us as he always has: through Apostles and Prophets.

For more information on restoration, see http://mormon.org/restoration.

Monday, April 15, 2013

Honestly, you don't want me to be honest...

As a parent, I try to encourage honesty in my children.  Voluntary confession of wrongdoing generally wins leniency in matters of discipline, whereas dishonesty or concealment results in the loss of more privileges.  Many parents implement similar policies to encourage honesty and communication with their children.

As much as parents may value honesty in their children, the standard is somewhat relaxed in other situations.

Many people are familiar with the scenario of a larger woman showing her outfit to her boyfriend and asking the question "does this make me look fat?"  Of course, what would the point of that question be since a "no" is expected whether it is honest or not.

On the other side of the coin, men seem comfortable increasing the length and weight of the fish that they caught on their last fishing trip, particularly when describing them to people they want to impress, or with whom they want to compete.

In societies where marriage is not arranged, both men and women become frustrated with one another over the dishonesty that seems inherent in the dating process.  I have spoken to women who express frustration when men promise to contact them for future romantic excursions when they have no intention of fulfilling such commitments.  I have personally experienced frustration when, while single, I worked up the nerve to ask a girl out, and was informed that while she "really wanted to" that she had scheduling conflicts due to "important" tasks such as "being busy."  I can empathize with those that are told after a couple of dates that the person in whom they have interest is "not ready for a relationship" only to see them engaged to someone else a short time later.

Ultimately, the motivation that causes otherwise honest individuals to lie is typically compassion.  The person wanting to avoid the date does not want to be or seem hurtful, so their fictitious schedule becomes quickly packed.  The boyfriend wants his girlfriend to feel appreciated, or at minimum to continue being his girlfriend in spite of a dress of incorrect size.  The man who caught a fish "as big as him" probably seeks respect from individuals for whom he feels respect.

The number of scenarios where "white lies" or "fibs" are better than the truth seems to increase all the time.  Please don't misunderstand, I am by no means advocating the cruel flavor of honesty that prevails due to the anonymity of the internet.  There, while people feel free to spout the filthiest and mot hurtful slurs, curses, or threats under the guise of "guest" on the forum or the mask of username "kingofhell1432" in a chat room, human decency is lost.  Increasingly, even without anonymity on sites such as Facebook or Twitter, people honestly express the most vulgar or hateful sentiments, and do not seem to worry about the feelings of others.

The truth is that honesty and compassion do not need to be enemies as much as we make them.  God finds value in all of his sons and daughters.  There is no person, however vile, disagreeable, or awkward they may seem, that Christ excluded from his infinite sacrifice. 

More to the point, does the boyfriend need to like every dress for him to express that the girlfriend is beautiful?  Does the man need to exaggerate the size of his catch to express that he values the respect of his peers?

That having been said, if honesty and compassion are at odds, the correct choice is honesty.  I certainly would have appreciated being told by girls that "would love to go out" but were "busy that day" actually meant "not interested in going out any day" if for no other reason than not to have to work up the nerve to call them again.  While it is not great to be undesirable, the feeling of having wasted a lot of time and effort needlessly combined with feeling undesirable is worse.

To say that God is similarly concerned with truth is an understatement.  Truth is so important to Christ that he assumes it as part of his identity: "I am the way, the truth, and the life..." (John 14:6)  Additionally, John states: "Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:31-32)

There were times when Jesus stood up for what was right and true.  He was perfectly honest when he exposed the money changers at the temple as making his Father's house a "den of thieves." (Matthew 21:13)  Jesus also knew when to avoid answering questions to maintain his honesty. (Matthew 21:23-27)

God's hope is that his children will come to value honesty as he does.  It is for this reason that he asks questions to which he already knows the answers.  Consider the example of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden:
"And they heard the voice of the Lord God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the Lord God amongst the trees of the garden.  And the Lord God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou? And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself. And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat? And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat. And the Lord God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat." (Genesis 3:8-13)

Of course, God already knew where Adam was, what he had done, and why he had done it... but he asked anyway.  Both Adam and Eve responded truthfully, and while the consequences of their actions have had lasting impact, God obviously valued their family, as he was willing to sacrifice his only begotten son to provide an opportunity to save them. (John 3:16)  He provided Adam and Eve opportunities to be honest in asking these questions.

A culture that values honesty is a culture that values the truth.  As a Christian, I believe the truth, ultimately, is not a cold and harsh thing.  The truth is that we are children of God, and that he loves us.  The truth is that the difficulties of mortality are temporary, and that adherence to principles of the Gospel bring lasting happiness.  Jesus Christ does want us to be honest, and he proved it is possible to be compassionate while doing it.  In the end, it is just as he said... "if ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."

Monday, March 4, 2013

With all the love in my heart, you're going to go to hell...

"Judge not that ye be not judged." (Matthew 7:1)

The passage about judgement is often quoted.  Some use the passage to persuade others to express Christian love and fellowship toward others.  Some use the passage ironically to condemn those that they believe are guilty of judgement.

Regardless of the purpose, the use of the passage has increased in society over the past several decades.  People are in generally more concerned with how people view one another than ever before.

I have had several individuals express particular concern over a certain demographic is treated.  Many people are worried about the feelings of individuals that struggle with a particular problem, and are worried that they are frequently and wrongfully judged.  Of course the group to which I am referring are those that struggle with smoking.

I know of people that are very kind, generous, God fearing, and virtuous, but that struggle with the terrible habit of smoking.  Many of these people go out of their way to try to keep the odor of tobacco away from those of us who find it distasteful.  These individuals can be sensitive to the disapproving looks of others.  There are some of these who feel ostracized even when they are honestly putting forth effort to stop this expensive and unhealthy habit.

For members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, there is on top of the negative odor, a spiritual aspect to the the practice, as it is prohibited by divine commandments called the word of wisdom.  For people in the LDS church, the smell of cigarettes is the smell of sinful behavior.  There are some who find the look of disgust on the faces of others to be a sign of judgment.  Of course, every person who gives such looks of disgust are themselves guilty of sins, even if they are not detectable by scent.  A good Christian should not assume that more obvious sins are the same as more obvious condemnation.

On the other side of the coin is the person who is accused of being judgemental when in fact, they may be making no spiritual assessment at all.  I have had close friendships with individuals who used cigarettes, but not even my friendship can remove the foul odor that lingers on the breath and clothing of those that smoke.  My belief that smokers are good people can't remove the expression of repulsion from my face.

There are those that do not find the odor of cigarettes to be distasteful.  In such a case, imagine an individual that has explosive diarrhea leaking out of their clothing...   how should a Christian express love and a spirit of inclusion to such a person who is extremely repulsive?  Even if the Christian is able to purge their thoughts of any judgmental thoughts such as that person should control them self better or that person is not appropriately caring for their bodies, what if they are unable to force a smile and give the sensation that the person who smells like an outhouse is truly welcome? 

Back to the cigarettes, is a person being judgmental if they avoid coming into a home that is filled with smoke?  Are they being judgmental if they avoid letting their children go to such a home because of concerns about second-hand smoke?

What is the right approach to tell someone that their behavior or status makes you uncomfortable without giving the impression that you are saying "with all the love in my heart, you're going to go to hell" ?

Christ spent his time among publicans and sinners, much to the disapproval of the Pharisees.  Of course, when asked about his company, he responded as follows:
"And when the Pharisees saw it, they said unto his disciples, Why eateth your Master with publicans and sinners? But when Jesus heard that, he said unto them, They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick. But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." (Matthew 9:11-13)

From this passage we get the implication that he was not simply "hanging out" with people, but he was asking them to change their behavior, or to call sinners to repentance.

Additionally, Christ did not seem ashamed to tell people that they were wrong, or even worse off than others.  Consider the following:
"... Jesus saith unto them, Verily I say unto you, That the publicans and the harlots go into the kingdom of God before you. For John came unto you in the way of righteousness, and ye believed him not: but the publicans and the harlots believed him: and ye, when ye had seen it, repented not afterward, that ye might believe him."  (Matthew 21:31-32)

Deriving appropriate behavior exclusively from Christ may be more challenging than it initially appears.  Jesus Christ will actually be the judge of all people, and he will have all the appropriate knowledge and authority to accurately threaten people with hellfire and damnation.  The rest of us are not always entitled to the same degree of perception.  Perhaps this is the purpose that Christ emphasized loving neighbor as self, turning the other cheek, going the extra mile, and demonstrating discipleship through love.

That having been said, disciples are not to tolerate sin.  Joshua's armies in the Old Testament were not successful against the people of Ai until Achan and all his household were killed and their remains burned because they had kept some of the spoils of Jericho. (Joshua 7)  The spirit of forgiveness seemed lessened in the New Testament case of Ananias and Sapphira when they misrepresented their income and did not give as much of their substance to the apostles as they should have. (Acts 5)

Ultimately, the concept of judgment is complicated.  Christians have an obligation to be benevolent and welcoming, but also an obligation to stand for truth and righteousness.  I suggest that the exact way to act in every case cannot be boiled down to a formula.  To one person or group it may be appropriate to say repent or be destroyed.  To another it is appropriate to say God is merciful and he will forgive.  An individual effort must be made to stand against wrongdoing, just as individual effort must be made to welcome, forgive, and express love to those that may be guilty of wrongdoing.  In such efforts, following the conscience is the best way to determine the approach that expresses love toward fellow children of God and encourages repentance of unacceptable behavior.

In the end, God wants all people to love one another and to repent of wrongdoing.  It is possible to hate the sin and love the sinner, because it is what he does.  The message for the person who is quick to judgement is to be more loving.  The message for the person who accepts any behavior to be inclusive is to stand up for what is right.  The message for the person who feels upset because other people are judging them is to try not to take all reactions personally, and to try to follow their conscience in efforts to improve themselves.  God does not judge so that he can condemn mankind to hell... he's trying to save us all. 

Thursday, January 17, 2013

Anatomy of a High Council Talk

High Council Sunday...  perhaps the most yawn-inducing event in all of Mormonism.  Of course there are some individuals with this calling that do have some speaking ability, but it seems that the vast majority of gentlemen that address LDS congregations monthly are not chosen for their speaking abilities.

 I frequently wonder if some of them know how terrible their talks are.  When the 12-year-old youth speaker outshines them with a monotone reading of a random New Era article, it makes the audience wonder if they intend to give a horrible talk as some sort of punishment.  Perhaps our ward's contributions to the Boy Scouts were low...  perhaps we had poor attendance at the Stake fireside, or Stake Priesthood meeting...  Perhaps the Stake Presidency just hates our ward...  Wonder no longer; today we will analyze the anatomy of a High Council talk!

The format for this lighthearted analysis will consist of the high council speaker's words in bold and their thoughts in italics.

Wow, that youth speaker had way better material than me...  maybe if I just take two minutes to arrange my papers, I can avoid an awkward transition.  Hey!  I remember this paper, it was something I doodled instead of preparing a talk!  Best decision ever!  Oh crap!  A lot of people are staring at me...  They don't look happy either...  what can I say so that they never find out I was assigned to this ward because the Stake presidency can't stand them?  Oh I know!

Brothers and Sisters, I bring you the love of the Stake Presidency...

Whew!  That was close.  Now I can just babble about them for a couple minutes...  I just have to remember not to bring up the fact that this ward didn't contribute enough to Boy Scouts so I don't offend anyone.  Although if they haven't already been offended by how tight an green my Scout shorts are, maybe it won't hurt...  I'm getting sidetracked though...  the number of screaming children has doubled since I started...  I know!  I can just tell them I worked hard on preparing my talk!

So anyway...  I have been given an important topic today...  it is the topic of prayer!

Heh!  That did it!  They know they will feel guilty if they don't listen to a talk about prayer!  Crap... what do I say now?

When I got this topic, I was really excited...

Why are everyone's eyes glazing over?  Do they know that I was lying about being excited about prayer?  Heck, last night I fell asleep after 2 minutes of praying and woke up in a pool of my own drool 2 hours later...

I remember when I was a boy, my parents taught me to pray...

Or more accurately, they would spank me when I prayed for the Lions to win more football games instead of grandma to get better...

It's a lesson I've never forgotten...

 Unless it's football season...

It reminds me of the scripture story about ...

Come on brain, don't fail me now...

Enoch..  who prayed all day and all night...

What are those primary kids whispering?  Did I say something wrong?  Enos...that's what they're saying?  Ah crap...

Oh right...  Enos...  your kids are smarter than I am...

Condescending brats!

Anyway, Enos prayed all day and all night, and...

It looks like everyone is calming down now.  I can just keep spouting random details about Enos and I will have like five minutes left.  I wonder how much time I've used.  Probably at least seven minutes out of my fifteen...  I'll just look at the clock...  oh crap, only two minutes!?!?!?  But it felt like forever...  I wonder if that's how the congregation feels...  nah...  they love me!

And so my Uncle Frank's cancer got worse, and we didn't know what to do...

What am I even saying?  How did I get to Uncle Frank's cancer?  Oh well, it has a lot of details, so that's sure to keep people occupied...

 And he was coughing out blood and he had difficulty using the toilet...  his vision wasn't great either, which made it difficult for him to enjoy his favorite game show, the Price is Right...

Heh!  That was a great show...  "Come on down!!!!"


And anyway, the cows would kick over the milk bucket and spill it all over...  I would get so mad at them...

Is that the sound of applause?  I know they must love me, but we probably shouldn't applaud in Sacrament meeting...  oh wait...  that's snoring...

And so that's why shopping on Sunday is bad...  Sure, I enjoy a doughnut as much as the next guy...  in fact, my wife tells me I enjoy them a bit more than the next guy...   but I have a testimony that the word of wisdom helps us in our lives....

I'm on a roll now! Everything is coming together now!

...and that's when my son told me that he appreciated my example...  and I'm not saying that to boast, I'm saying that the Savior has blessed me...

...probably more than you...  Yeah, I'm both awesome AND humble!

...and I loved my mother...  she was the best...  even with her dementia and when she started fires in the care center that we sent her to...

Man I hated that care center...  I hope my kids send me someplace nicer when I lose it...

...and that's what happens when you try to go fishing without bait...  I mean what did you expect when...

What's that on my shoulder?  Oh...  it's the Bishop tapping his watch...  well he doesn't have to glare at me...

Well brothers and sisters...  Bishop is tapping his watch so I guess I should wrap it up...  I just want to bear my testimony of prayer.  I love prayer...  and that reminds me of when my daughter was sick and she was just puking all over the place...  it was the really gross...

Oh and that's just like when my sister ate that chicken that we had left out too long...  that was awful...

...so it's a good thing I had health insurance...  it's also a good thing to...

What now?!?!  Oh it's the Bishop tapping his watch again...  no wonder the Stake President doesn't like this ward...  they don't even let you finish your train of thought...

 Well... anyway...  that's my testimony of prayer...

I think that talk went pretty well!  I'm sure the reason all the people in the congregation are sleeping is because of the early meeting schedule...

Obviously this account is a bit tongue in cheek... but the kernel of truth at its core is that everyone could benefit from a little preparation, or with a greater understanding of oration.  Obviously no one is going to be as good as Jesus, who astonished people with his power and authority, (Matthew 7:28-29) but it should be the practice of Christians to try to connect with their audience when expressing the importance of his gospel.

It is also understood that there are some people who will not accept or appreciate the truth regardless of the presentation method, but for those that are sitting in a church congregation, this is likely a very small number.

If you are assigned to give a talk, consider the negative feelings that come on high council Sunday, and try and avoid pointless details and incoherent ramblings.  No one cares about how you prepare a talk unless it is really really good, and if they think it is, they will ask you.  Don't waste time on that subject during the talk.  Be mindful of the time.  Even great orators that can hold an audience's attention for long stretches know the value of being concise.  It is better to have a short talk with value and substance than a long talk that will be forgotten before the benediction.

 Ultimately, know one is perfect, but it doesn't hurt to try to be better....

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Contention may be of the Devil, but Jesus was really good at it!

Having one's views attacked can be aggravating and frustrating whether the views are political, religious, or based on the type of music/movies/shows that a person enjoys.  Of course, closing in on the presidential race in the United States of America, arguments have become heated in many forums.  People that normally remember to say "please" and "thank you" have in many cases been seen slinging that which is vulgar and profane.  Arguments in many cases have the power to bring out the worst in humanity.

Certainly it is no coincidence that Jesus taught in the Book of Mormon the following:
"For verily, verily I say unto you, he that hath the spirit of contention is not of me, but is of the devil, who is the father of contention, and he stirreth up the hearts of men to contend with anger, one with another.  Behold, this is not my doctrine, to stir up the hearts of men with anger, one against another; but this is my doctrine, that such things should be done away."  (3 Nephi 11:29-30)

The passage in the Book of Mormon is quite plain and direct, and certainly in harmony with the messages that he shared famously in his sermon on the mount:
"Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloke also. And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain. Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away. Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven..." (Matthew 5:38-45)

Jesus seemed clear that people probably should not participate in arguments or contentions.  That having been said, he was himself a target of many of the Pharisees and Sadducees that dominated religious thought in Galilee and Judea during his mortal life.  The gospels are filled with accounts of the various attempts that were made to argue against Jesus.  The truth is, as much as he talked about the vices of pride and wrath that are so easily stimulated by arguments, Jesus was really really good at arguing.

One example was the group of Pharisees that thought they could trap Jesus by asking whether it was lawful to pay tribute to Caesar.  If Jesus were to say it was lawful, they could attack his popularity because Roman occupation was despised by the Jews.  If he were to say it was not lawful, they could report him to the Romans for sedition.  His response was perfect:
"Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny. And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? They say unto him, Cæsar’s. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Cæsar the things which are Cæsar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s." (Matthew 22:19-21)

Jesus gave the perfect answer.  By asking about the image on the coin, those that had thought they could trap him were forced to portray themselves as having overlooked something obvious.  Additionally, he could not be accused of sedition, nor could his piety be questioned by suggesting that people give to Caesar what is his and to God what is his.

Sadducees attempted to attack Christ's affirmation of the resurrection with a hypothetical situation:
"Saying, Master, Moses said, If a man die, having no children, his brother shall marry his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother. Now there were with us seven brethren: and the first, when he had married a wife, deceased, and, having no issue, left his wife unto his brother: Likewise the second also, and the third, unto the seventh. And last of all the woman died also. Therefore in the resurrection whose wife shall she be of the seven? for they all had her. Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven. But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God, saying, I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living." (Matthew 22:24-32)

In this case, he showed his amazing ability by ignoring the hypothetical situation which was a distraction from the real point of whether or not there would be a resurrection of the dead.  Though they had come to attack his views for something they felt was inconsistent, he was able to counter by identifying their own inconsistency.

On another occasion, enemies tried to trap him by asking Jesus the source of his authority.  If he were to say God, they would accuse him of blasphemy (even though it was true).  If he were to say some other source, they could accuse him of being a false prophet.  He took the advice that he had given in his sermon on the mount when he said:
"Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you."  (Matthew 7:6)

Instead of answering the question they posed, he posed a similar question to them:
"And Jesus answered and said unto them, I also will ask you one thing, which if ye tell me, I in like wise will tell you by what authority I do these things. The baptism of John, whence was it? from heaven, or of men? And they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we shall say, From heaven; he will say unto us, Why did ye not then believe him? But if we shall say, Of men; we fear the people; for all hold John as a prophet. And they answered Jesus, and said, We cannot tell. And he said unto them, Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things."  (Matthew 21:24-27)

His enemies were never able to win an argument with him, so in the end, they paid Judas Iscariot to betray him so they could secretly arrange for his death.  Ironically, they were not able to surprise him or beat him even with their murderous conspiracy, as Jesus raised himself from the dead.

Back to the subject of arguments, there are some that may wonder why Jesus even participated in verbal contests when he seemed so against them.  The effort to understand why he debated those that tried to trap him is fundamental to understanding the responsibilities of all Christians to defend the truth, and balancing that with the need to show respect and kindness to all of God's children.

Modern prophets and apostles have encouraged participation in discussions about the church:
"There are conversations going on about the Church constantly. Those conversations will continue whether or not we choose to participate in them. But we cannot stand on the sidelines while others, including our critics, attempt to define what the Church teaches. While some conversations have audiences in the thousands or even millions, most are much, much smaller. But all conversations have an impact on those who participate in them. Perceptions of the Church are established one conversation at a time."  (M. Russel Ballard http://www.lds.org/ensign/2008/07/sharing-the-gospel-using-the-internet?lang=eng)

In spite of the possibility that disagreements or contentions may arise, or the fact that the internet is crawling with trolls that, like the Pharisees of old, feel satisfaction in discrediting, angering, and bullying others, Christians have a responsibility to help others both by charitably imparting of their tangible substance, and by sharing the good news that Christ is alive and has power to save us all.  That having been said, there are lessons to learn from the methods used by Christ himself for dealing with trolls.

Many people that attack Christians do so based on the idea of logical arguments.  A logical argument is like a house where the roof represents a conclusion or premise that is supported by walls representing supporting evidence or reasons.  The basic idea behind attacking a logical argument is that if all or many of the supporting reasons are eliminated, the conclusion falls just as if the walls of a house are knocked down or weakened, the roof falls.

This concept is important for many discussions, such as jury deliberations where the conclusion of the defendant's guilt is dismissed when reasonable doubt knocks down or weakens the evidence that supports the conclusion.  As important as critical thinking techniques are in making some decisions, matters of philosophy, ethics, and faith are not always best served by such techniques.

An example of this can be seen in the following hypothetical situation:
There is a Christian that believes in God, and that the Bible represents the word of God.  He has friends that are historians that have informed him about evidence that supports his belief in that ancient Biblical cities are mentioned in archaeological artifacts.  A skeptical friend finds that the mention of these cities can be explained by the fact that the Bible was written centuries later and used the names of old cities to appear to be of ancient origin.  Because there is no other tangible evidence of the Bible's authenticity that the Christian is able to enumerate, the skeptic explains that there is no reason for him to believe in the Bible.

Obviously, belief in God and the Bible does not need to be based on tangible evidence.  It is based on faith.  Consequently, when the supporting evidences of religious conclusions are attacked, their is an invisible pillar in the center that prevents the conclusion from falling.  Since a person of faith does not need tangible evidence to support their conclusion, exposing reasons or evidence of belief to those that might attack it is like casting pearls before swine.  Conclusions of faith such as those that God lives, that the Bible is accurate, and that prophets dispense the truths of heaven to mankind are not conclusions that require logical defense, so do not provide them.

Secular conclusions on the other hand do require logical and tangible justification.  It is typically easy to discern a person who is genuinely interested in faith from one who is genuinely interested in destroying faith by asking them to defend their philosophical and ethical positions.  Since such positions put them in a position of vulnerability, they will try and evade, stall, or shift the burden of proof to you.  Individuals that are genuinely interested in conversation will not maneuver you into positions where you may look bad.  Ending a conversation is not the same as conceding an opponent was correct.  If an attacker refuses to expose their reasoning, it might be wise to do as Christ did when he was pressed on the source of his authority and follow suit.

Avoiding contention does not necessarily mean avoiding pointing out flaws in reasoning.  Jesus was not afraid to tell people that they were acting hypocritical, or to condemn incorrect principles.  Going back to the example where Christ countered the Sadducees regarding their misunderstanding of the resurrection, it is good to use critical thinking to examine the integrity of secular conclusions.  Particularly in matters of ethics, few secularists have examined their views.  In recent conversations I have had for example, secularists claimed that their ethical behavior was guided by the principles of "empathy and compassion."  It does not take much critical thinking to show that these principles fall apart when administering justice.  If a person does not want to be held against their will, empathy and compassion tell them that imprisoning others even if they are guilty of heinous crimes is unethical.  Relativists that believe something is good only because an individual or group has labeled it good strip themselves of moral judgement entirely.  If something is bad because a person does not like it, then that puts bad acts such as child molestation on equal moral ground as having to eat vegetables.  The need for God in ethics is something I have previously touched on in this post.

Christianity assumes that humanity consists of more than animals with a large number of adaptations making survival easier... The assertion is that people are the children of Almighty God.  From the perspective of the Mormon church, we assert that each human being lived before they came to earth with our Heavenly Father, and that after we die, we will return to face him, and be held accountable for our choices.  The understanding that God is omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, and benevolent is fundamental to our faith.  With that understanding, context is added to the story of the creation of the earth.  A being with tremendous power went to a lot of trouble to send us to a place where we would not remember him and where we could not typically see, hear, or tangibly perceive him.  He did not completely abandon humanity though, and provided spiritual sources for learning truths.  The environment created was brilliant in its design since it truly imparts free will to men.  The choices and desires of every human are not compelled by the Heavens.

Another assertion made by most Christians is that all human beings are given something to help them identify and recognize good and truth.  The conscience is sometimes referred to as the light of Christ in accordance with the description of the Apostle John:
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.  There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world."  (John 1:1-9)

People have a general understanding of how to perceive good.  They have an instinct that draws them toward God in some fashion.  While no one follows their conscience perfectly, and while there are some that rarely use it, it is capable of being as recognizable as the image and superscription on a coin.  Just as Jesus was not afraid to point out to his attackers what they should have already noticed, so should those that defend faith in Christ be willing to point out that people are already capable of recognizing truth without dependence on tangible evidence.  Like recognizing a scent, people know instinctively when something is right.  With regular, diligent use, anyone is capable of recognizing the truths of God and his Christ.  Odds are, any individual that attacks faith knows in their heart that they are wrong.  Even if they do not know it, they are still the person that will be most persuasive in convincing themselves that they should have faith.

The responsibility of Christians to invite all to come to Christ is not a policy to hunt down antagonists and attempt to humiliate them.  It is a policy of spreading the good news of Jesus.  Christ proclaimed the truth to all; his religion was his identity.  The same should be the case for those that aspire to be called Christians.

When a discussion moves to become antagonistic, affirm the truth and end the discussion.  Endless bashing between individuals is at best a waste of time, and at worst, could tragically turn a friend into an enemy.  In persuading others to accept Christ, Christians must not abandon his teachings.  In the end, what made Christ so good when he contended with those that sought to malign him was his ability to know when not to contend, and when to step away.

Winning a petty argument is meaningless since everyone will eventually agree.  In the end, Jesus will come in triumph and glory.  He will be the hero that appears in the moment of peril and despair to save his people.  Every knee will bow before His Majesty.  The good news is that he wants everyone on his side.

Monday, September 3, 2012

The Word of Foolishness

Recently, the Mormon church produced an official clarification regarding the stance of consuming caffeine.  For a long time, members of the LDS church have had varying opinions regarding whether it was permissible to drink colas or other caffeinated beverages.  I have listened to passionate exchanges regarding the exact wording of section 89 of the Doctrine and Covenants (which is known as the Word of Wisdom to Mormons) and the implication of Gordon B. Hinckley's words in the CBS program 60 Minutes where he implied that faithful members of the church avoid caffeinated soft drinks.

On the one hand of the debate, I have heard people in favor of drinking caffeinated beverages ask "where does sit say caffeine in the Word of Wisdom?"  True enough, the word cannot be found there.  On the other hand, the word "heroin" or the phrase "huffing markers" and a variety of other practices seem to be missing, although the church openly condemns addictive and/or illegal drugs.  (http://www.lds.org/bc/content/shared/content/english/pdf/ForTheStrengthOfYouth-eng.pdf?lang=eng pp 25-27)

On the other hand of the debate, I have heard people interpreting "addictive" such that it applies to almost anything.  While pain killers and stimulants may be described by those that use them as needful, the need for food and water obviously does not represent an addiction to be avoided.

Along with a list of prohibitions, the Word of Wisdom also contains a list of practices that are encouraged.  These items also spark controversy among Mormons... particularly those that believe in the divinity of vegetarianism.

I recall a time when I was proclaiming my affinity to meat (I believe I was referencing delicious Memphis-style pulled pork barbecue) when I was rebuked by another member who pointed out passages from the Word of Wisdom.  The actual verses that describe the concern expressed read as follows: "Yea, flesh also of beasts and of the fowls of the air, I, the Lord, have ordained for the use of man with thanksgiving; nevertheless they are to be used sparingly; And it is pleasing unto me that they should not be used, only in times of winter, or of cold, or famine. All grain is ordained for the use of man and of beasts, to be the staff of life, not only for man but for the beasts of the field, and the fowls of heaven, and all wild animals that run or creep on the earth; And these hath God made for the use of man only in times of famine and excess of hunger." (D&C 89:12-15)

There was an individual with whom I spoke that was convinced that this was the most important element of the Word of Wisdom.  They believed that the reason these lines were present was to warn us of the evils of farming cattle.  The wide-eyed, sincere explanation I was given indicated that cattle produced a large amount of methane gas, and that if we allowed all that methane to be produced the ice caps would melt and life as we knew it would end.

While I have heard many theories about events and actions that might lead to the end of civilization, that was the only occasion of which I know where cow farts were suggested.

I have also heard arguments that were better crafted in favor of vegetarianism.  Many of them quote prominent church leaders.  Bruce R. McConkie said in his The Millenial Messiah " Isaiah gives us these poetically phrased particulars about animal life during the Millennium. ‘The wolf and the lamb shall feed together,’ he says, ‘and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock.’ Implicit in this pronouncement is the fact that man and all forms of life will be vegetarians in the coming day; the eating of meat will cease, because, for one thing, death as we know it ceases. There will be no shedding of blood, because man and beast are changed (quickened) and blood no longer flows in their veins.” (p 658)  George Q. Cannon stated "We should by every means in our power impress upon the rising generation the value of life and how dreadful a sin it is to take life. The lives of animals even should be held far more sacred than they are. Young people should be taught to be very merciful to the brute creation and not to take life wantonly or for sport. The practice of hunting and killing game merely for sport should be frowned upon and not encouraged among us. God has created the fowls and the beasts for man’s convenience and comfort and for his consumption at proper times and under proper circumstances; but he does not justify men in wantonly killing those creatures which He has made and with which He has supplied the earth” (George Q. Cannon, Gospel Truth: Discourses and Writings of President George Q. Cannon p 24)

Certainly these statements gain credibility from members who recognize the names of Apostles.  I have read that Lorenzo Snow, Joseph F. Smith, and Joseph Fielding Smith were also proponents of eating meat only very sparingly in accordance with the Word of Wisdom.

Why then do modern leaders seem to place such an emphasis on avoiding alcohol, tobacco, and harmful drugs instead of echoing the words in the scriptures themselves?  I submit it is because they are privileged to give interpretation of the scriptures (not just the Word of Wisdom, but all scriptures) that is both currently prudent and generally applicable to all people.  In other words, prophets are authorized to prophesy.  The current emphasis as spoken through general conferences and general statements constitutes authoritatively the will of God himself.

To illustrate the need for current interpretation of the scriptures (even more modern scriptures such as the Doctrine and Covenants), here is a scripturally based argument that drinking beer is consistent with the Word of Wisdom:

"That inasmuch as any man drinketh wine or strong drink among you, behold it is not good, neither meet in the sight of your Father, only in assembling yourselves together to offer up your sacraments before him. And, behold, this should be wine, yea, pure wine of the grape of the vine, of your own make. And, again, strong drinks are not for the belly, but for the washing of your bodies." (D&C 89:5-7)  This passage implies that wine is permissible to drink only if it is home-made and used only in Sacrament services.  The conclusion is that not all alcohol is bad.  Further on, the Word of Wisdom reads "All grain is good for the food of man; as also the fruit of the vine; that which yieldeth fruit, whether in the ground or above the ground— Nevertheless, wheat for man, and corn for the ox, and oats for the horse, and rye for the fowls and for swine, and for all beasts of the field, and barley for all useful animals, and for mild drinks, as also other grain." (D&C 89:16-17, emphasis added)  In this passage, the use of grains for mild drinks is approved.  Barley is particularly used in the brewing of beer, which is not necessarily a "strong" alcoholic beverage.  Since other grains can be used in the starch source for beer, the clause at the end of verse 17 seems to permit beer that contains other grains.  The conclusion based on this reading of the scriptures themselves is that it is ok for Mormons to have a cold one!

Of course, the argument that beer is ok is tongue-in-cheek.  Modern prophets are very clear on the current standards necessary to show compliance with the Word of Wisdom.  President Thomas S. Monson said "Hard drugs, wrongful use of prescription drugs, alcohol, coffee, tea, and tobacco products destroy your physical, mental, and spiritual well-being. Any form of alcohol, including beer, is harmful to your spirit and your body. Tobacco can enslave you, weaken your lungs, and shorten your life." (http://www.lds.org/new-era/2008/10/standards-of-strength?lang=eng, emphasis added)

The truth is that the scriptures, while vitally important, are only one tool to learning the will of God.  God called circumcision an everlasting covenant (Genesis 17:10-14), yet later, the Apostle Paul said "Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God." (1 Corinthians 7:19)  These scriptural points seem to be mutually exclusive.  While some of the law of Moses including animal sacrifice was fulfilled with the coming of Christ, Paul was clear that works of the flesh, most of which being at odds with the law of Moses, would prevent entrance to the Kingdom of God: "Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God." (Galations 5:19-21)

Even the laws of health given by God have changed over time.  Through Moses, God declared the laws for animals which were and were not permissible to eat. (Deuteronomy 14:3-20)  Through Peter, God declared that this law had been changed. (Acts 11:2-18)

The ultimate conclusion that Latter-Day Saints should draw is that if God really had a problem with caffeine, he would probably tell us through prophets.  If God's biggest worry was the low number of Mormon vegetarians, we would hear General Conference talks on it frequently.  Based on recent conference addresses, it seems that generally he is far more worried about the use of tobacco, alcohol, and harmful drugs than he is about burgers and Mountain Dew.  That is not to say that individually, he may want certain people to be more healthy, and it is possible on an individual basis that people may be moved to change their diets or exercise habits, but this is not the doctrine to be preached to all members from the pulpit or in Sunday School.

God may be the same yesterday today and forever, but the things he asks his followers to do may change.  Taking into account only one source of truth will never result in a complete understanding.  Those that only look to the scriptures, or only look to prayer, or only look to a prophet may miss out on truths of God that can be found elsewhere.  Being stuck on a few words in scripture that are resolved by modern prophets can turn the Word of Wisdom into the Word of Foolishness.

When everything is visible, when all truth is known, the concepts that may seem to mutually exclude one another will no longer be seen as contradictory.  Mormons should not limit their search for truth to any one source.  President Joseph F. Smith said "We believe in all truth, no matter to what subject it may refer. No sect or religious denomination in the world possesses a single principle of truth that we do not accept or that we will reject. We are willing to receive all truth, from whatever source it may come; for truth will stand, truth will endure.” (Conference Report, Apr. 1909 p 7)